There has never been greater potential for building the forces of revolutionary Marxism, for running independent socialist candidates, and for building a new mass socialist party.
Despite the tremendous energy of the Finnish masses, their leaders betrayed the revolution, and the forces of counterrevolution unleashed a bloodbath.
What exactly does it mean to be a “democratic socialist” or a “social democrat”?
Revolutionary Marxists must combat liberalism on the basis of class-independence, scientific socialist theory, and revolutionary internationalism.
The current wave of electoral campaigns associating themselves with socialism is an indication of the dramatic shift in the consciousness of the US working class.
Socialism is on the minds of millions of Americans for the first time. Inevitably, many have different ideas of what “socialism” means.
The political landscape is shifting fast in the US, and Democratic strategists are hoping to use this momentum to their advantage.
How can we reach the masses? This question has been at the center of revolutionary debate since the birth of the socialist movement.
Mass uprisings are all but guaranteed by the impasse of capitalism—the question is whether a revolutionary leadership will be ready when it happens.
In the editorial for Socialist Revolution Issue 4, we examine the question of reformism versus revolution, as well as so-called “non-reformist reforms.”
Though such reforms are now considered common sense, the Democrats can’t and won’t deliver. Only a mass independent political force—with single payer placed at the top of its agenda—is capable of winning this fight.
From a Marxist point of view, the Bolshevik Revolution was the greatest single event in world history. Why? Because here, for the first time, if we exclude the heroic but tragic episode of the Paris […]
